Expand all Collapse all
Some basic Real-Time PCR terms and their definitions are:
Amplification plot—Plot of fluorescent signal versus cycle number.
Baseline—The initial cycles of PCR where there is little to no change in fluorescence.
Threshold—The arbitrary level of fluorescence used for Cq determination. Should be set above the baseline and within the exponential growth phase of the amplification plot.
Cq (quantification cycle)—The fractional cycle number where fluorescence increases above the threshold. Also referred to as Ct (threshold cycle) or Cp (quantification cycle).
R—Reporter signal.
Rn—Normalized reporter signal.
ΔRn—Baseline subtracted normalized reporter signal.
Slope—Indicates the efficiency of the reaction. With 10-fold dilutions, a slope of -3.32 indicates a perfect doubling of product per cycle (100% PCR efficiency).
R2—Reports the linearity of the standard curve.
In some cases it is possible to convert existing traditional PCR assays into Real-Time PCR assays, with a few considerations around primer design and master mix. Primer design is one of the first considerations for converting a traditional PCR assay. Real-Time PCR is most efficient with relatively short amplicon lengths, in the range of 50 to 150 bp. Longer products can be used if the cycling conditions are changed to accommodate longer extension times, but you should avoid products longer than 300 bp. In some cases it might be possible to design a TaqMan probe to hybridize between the two existing PCR primers. If not, you can use SYBR Green I for detection. (See other FAQs for information on TaqMan and SYBR Green I.)
There are two major detection chemistries used for Real-Time PCR: hydrolysis (TaqMan) probe-based chemistry and DNA-binding SYBR Green I dye-based chemistry. Less used detection chemistries include Molecular Beacons, Scorpion probes and LUX primers.
In TaqMan probe-based chemistry, also known as the fluorogenic 5’ nuclease assay, an oligonucleotide probe anneals to a specific sequence downstream of one of the PCR primers. The oligonucleotide is labeled with a fluorescent reporter dye at the 5’ end and a quencher dye at the 3’. When the probe is intact, the reporter is in close proximity to the quencher and the fluorescent signal is low as the energy from the reporter will be transferred to the quencher through Fluorescent Resonant Energy Transfer (FRET). During PCR, as Taq DNA polymerase extends from the primers, the 5’ exonuclease activity of the enzyme cleaves the annealed probe to separate the reporter dye from the quencher dye, increasing the fluorescent signal.
SYBR Green I is a dye that binds only to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and its fluorescent signal increases only when bound to dsDNA. During PCR, the fluorescent signal of SYBR Green I increases along with the dsDNA amplicon.
The main advantage of TaqMan chemistry is that a fluorescent signal is generated only when there is specific hybridization of the probe to the target sequence. No signal is generated from any non-specific amplification products that were formed during the reaction. Another advantage is that probes can be labeled with different, spectrally distinct reporter dyes, which allows the amplification of multiple target sequences within a single tube (multiplex Real-Time PCR). The main disadvantage of TaqMan chemistry is that design and synthesis of different dual-labeled probes is required for each target sequence, which increases assay setup and cost.
The main advantage of SYBR Green I chemistry is that it only requires the design and synthesis of two PCR primers, which decreases assay setup and cost. Another advantage for SYBR Green I chemistry is the ability to perform melt curves. The main disadvantage of SYBR Green I chemistry is that since SYBR Green I binds to any dsDNA present during the reaction it will bind to and generate a signal for any non-specific amplification that occurs.
The specificity of any Real-Time PCR assay, whether TaqMan probe or SYBR Green I, is determined by the quality of the assay design. Non-specific amplification can occur for both SYBR Green I or TaqMan probe methods if the assay design is poor.
TaqMan assays will not generate a signal for any non-specific amplification whereas SYBR Green I assays might. However, non-specific amplification will affect the amplification efficiency and sensitivity of TaqMan assays in the same way as SYBR Green I assays, even though the amplification is not detected.
When designing primers for either system, it is important to avoid primer sets that generate any non-specific amplification products. With SYBR Green I assays, the ability to perform melt curve analysis is advantageous for primer design, as any non-specific amplification can be detected and identified in the melt curve. For TaqMan assays, detecting non-specific amplification usually requires another post-PCR analysis method such as agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products. Alternatively, the primers could be used in PCR with SYBR Green I and melt curve analysis performed after amplification to determine if any non-specific amplification occurs. This optimizes the primer design without the expense of a labeled probe.
There are numerous primer design tools commercially available for purchase or freely accessible via the web. These tools simplify assay design significantly. Some widely used primer design tools are Primer Express (Applied Biosystems), Beacon Designer (Premier Biosoft) and Real Time Design(BioSearch Technologies). Numerous websites contain databases of validated primer sets, including RTPrimerDB (http://medgen.ugent.be/rtprimerdb/) and the Quantitative PCR Primer Database (http://web.ncifcrf.gov/rtp/gel/primerdb/)
If you design primers and probes manually, follow these criteria from the Primer Express manual:
The following table details the excitation and emission wavelengths of Eco in each channel. The emission filters combined with spectral de-convolution algorithms effectively minimize cross-talk between dyes. Eco is factory calibrated for SYBR Green I, FAM, HEX, VIC, ROX, and Cy5. You can use other dyes if they are within the wavelength range of the emission filters.
Channel
Excitation (nm)
Emission (nm)
Example Fluorophores Detected
1
452–486
505–545
SYBR Green I, FAM
2
542–582
604–644
ROX
3
562–596
HEX, VIC
4
665–705
Cy5
The Eco optical system supports dyes within four channels, ranging from 505 to 705 nm. The optical system can detect any dyes that fall within those ranges.
Developing multiplex Real-Time PCR assays can be difficult and time-consuming. As the reaction complexity increases, significant optimization may be required to generate reliable data. It can be a challenge to develop multiplex assays that amplify all targets with equal efficiency.
When developing multiplex Real-Time PCR assays, you need to consider primer design, the relative expression levels of target sequences, and master mix / reagent conditions.
Use the same design criteria for each primer/probe set and screen all sequences against each other to determine any potential primer-dimer formation. In addition, perform a BLAST analysis (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) to determine primer specificity.
If the expression levels of the target sequences are significantly different, the most abundant target will be preferentially amplified and deplete all the reaction components, compromising amplification of the less abundant targets. One way to address this issue is to limit the primer concentrations of the most abundant target, using the lowest primer concentration that produces the same Cq and PCR efficiency. Limiting the primer allows the most abundant target to amplify and go to completion without depleting all the reagents needed for the other sequences.
Amplifying multiple target sequences creates additional demand for reaction components. Taq DNA polymerase, Mg++ and dNTP concentrations may need to be optimized to improve amplification of all targets. Master mixes optimized specifically for multiplex Real-Time PCR are now commercially available, and can reduce the amount of time required for optimization.
The most widely used method to quantify RNA is traditional UV spectroscopy. A diluted RNA sample is quantified by measuring its absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm. The concentration is calculated using the equation:
[RNA] μg/ml = A260 x dilution factor x 40
where 40 is the average extinction coefficient for RNA
In addition, the A260/A280 ratio can be used to estimate RNA purity. An A260/A280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.1 indicates a highly pure RNA sample.
UV spectroscopy is relatively simple to perform but has several drawbacks. It does not discriminate between RNA and DNA so it is advisable to DNAse treat RNA samples before quantifying. DNA in the sample will lead to an overestimation of RNA concentration. Since proteins and residual phenol from the purification can interfere with absorbance readings, it is important to remove these contaminants in purification. Also, absorbance readings are dependent on pH and ionic strength. Dilute RNA samples in TE (pH 8.0) and use TE to blank the spectrophotometer before taking absorbance readings.
An alternative method for quantifying RNA samples is to use fluorescent dyes such as RiboGreen (Invitrogen). RiboGreen exhibits a strong fluorescent signal when bound to nucleic acids. Samples are quantified in a fluorescence microplate reader or standard spectrophotometer relative to a nucleic acid standard curve of known concentration. The linear range of quantification using RiboGreen is three orders of magnitude, from 1 μg/ml down to 1 ng/ml. The major advantage of fluorescent dyes over absorbence-based methods is that it is not affected by contaminating proteins or organic solvents carried over from the purification process. DNAse treatment is still recommended as RiboGreen does not discriminate between RNA and DNA.
In Real-Time RT-qPCR, genomic DNA can potentially be co-amplified during the PCR reaction, contaminating the sample and leading to erroneous results. To determine if an RNA sample is contaminated with genomic DNA it is important to include a no-reverse transcriptase control during the RT step, and all RT-qPCR experiments should include a no-RT control. If the RNA sample is free of genomic DNA contamination the no-RT controls should not generate any signal after Real-Time PCR.
To avoid genomic DNA contamination, treat RNA samples with DNAse before reverse transcription. Alternatively, design the PCR primers to anneal to sequences of the transcript that span a large intron. Primers designed in this way can only amplify cDNA.
The difference between one-step and two-step real time RT-qPCR lies mainly in the reverse transcription step. In one-step RT-qPCR, a short reverse transcription (5–30 minute) reaction is followed by a PCR reaction in a single tube. In two-step RT-qPCR the reverse transcription reaction takes place in a separate tube. Each method has advantages and disadvantages, depending on the application.
One-step real time RT-qPCR, which uses gene-specific primers, is useful when analyzing a few genes over a large number of samples. Since both the RT and PCR reactions occur in the same tube, there is less pipetting and sample manipulation, possibly reducing variation and potential contamination. One-step RT-qPCR might not be as sensitive as two-step since its reverse transcription step is much shorter. The reaction conditions needed to support both the RT and PCR reactions might not be optimal for either reaction. Another drawback of one-step RT-qPCR is that it is not possible to archive the cDNA produced during the reverse transcription reaction.
Two-step real time RT-qPCR is useful when analyzing a large number of genes over a few samples. It supports a flexible priming strategy, allowing for oligo-dT, random primers, or gene-specific primers. Two-step RT-qPCR is generally more sensitive than one-step since the RT reaction is much longer and the RT and PCR reactions occur separately, meaning that they can be optimized individually. Also, the cDNA produced is more stable than the initial RNA sample and can be more easily archived for future use.
The Illumina Eco analysis software uses the ΔΔCq method (Livak et al., 2001), which is the most commonly used analysis method for relative quantification. The ΔΔCq method reports fold change in gene expression of a target gene relative to that of a reference gene and reference (calibrator) sample. The reference gene is typically a housekeeping gene such as GAPDH, β-actin, β2-microglobin or HPRT. The choice of reference sample can vary depending on the type of gene expression experiment. For example, a reference sample might be an untreated control sample relative to a treated sample, normal tissue relative to diseased tissue, or liver relative to brain.
For the ΔΔCq method to be valid certain assumptions must be met. First, the reference gene must be stably expressed between different cells of tissues and unaffected by any experimental treatment. Second, the amplification efficiencies of both target gene and reference gene must be approximately equal. Both of the conditions should be experimentally validated for each experiment before the ΔΔCq method can be used.
When extreme accuracy is needed, the Eco software supports use of multiple reference genes as well as PCR efficiency correction.
Selection of a reference gene or genes is a critical step for expression analysis using Real-Time PCR. Validation of reference genes for each experimental condition is critical for obtaining accurate Real-Time PCR data. Validation requires determining if expression of the reference gene is stable between cells of different tissues and if any experimental treatment affects expression.
The following paper contains a good summary of the validation process:
Dheda K., et al. Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in Real-Time PCR. Biotechniques 2004; 37: 112–119.
The process starts with extracting and quantifyingRNA samples from the samples under investigation (diseased v. normal; treated v. untreated). The next step is normalizing the input of RNA into the reverse transcription reaction. The expression of a panel of different reference genes is then measured by Real-Time PCR and the differences in Cq across the different samples is determined for each gene.
High-resolution melt curve analysis requires a different class of dsDNA binding dyes, extremely precise instrumentation, and specialized software.
HRM analysis is generally performed using dsDNA binding dyes other than SYBR Green I. These dyes are generally known as saturating dsDNA-binding dyes, and include SYTO 9 (Invitrogen), LCGreen (Idaho Tech), and EvaGreen (Biotium Inc.). These dyes differ from SYBR Green I in that they are significantly less inhibitory to PCR. This reduced inhibition allows them to be used at much higher concentrations than SYBR Green I that saturate the dsDNA amplicons. Greater dye saturation provides greater sensitivity and resolution of melt curve profiles.
Extremely precise instrumentation is important for HRM. Since some mutations only cause Tm shifts of a fraction of a degree, any thermal or optical non-uniformity will reduce the ability to detect these sequence changes. To be able to perform HRM analysis an instrument needs to have a fast acquisition rate, precise temperature control, and an absolute minimum of thermal and optical variation between samples.
HRM also requires is software with specialized analysis algorithms that can analyze the shape of melt profiles and group similar melt profiles together. HRM data can be viewed as either normalized melt curves or difference plots. Difference plots show the difference in fluorescence from a selected reference sample. Some software also features an auto-call feature, which can automatically assign genotypes based on melt profiles.
Temperature control and uniformity are the most challenging factors affecting HRM. The Tm shift for a single base change can be as small as 0.2° C for challenging Class IV A to T single nucleotide polymorphisms. Most current block-based instruments report temperature uniformity specifications in the range of ± 0.25° C to ± 0.5° C, generally considered too high to reliably differentiate a Class IV SNP. Block-based instruments that claim to perform HRM do so by extensive calibration and software compensation or by employing specialized analysis methods, such as temperature shifting, to overcome the thermal non-uniformity across the block.
Eco’s unique thermal block provides thermal uniformity of ± 0.1° C, well above the industry standard for a block-based system. This extreme thermal uniformity allows Eco to perform HRM without software corrections. The thermal uniformity of Eco supports genotyping of even the most challenging Class IV SNPs.
Currently, Eco plates can only be purchased from Illumina. The pricing is aligned with the price of plates on other systems. On average, the price of consumables (plates and seals) is about 20% less expensive than the list price offered by the competition.
COMPLETE PRICE* (US$)
Eco 48‑well
Abgene 96-well
ABI 96‑well
ABI 48‑well
Rotorgene 72‑well
Stratagene 96‑well
BioRad 96‑well
BioRad 48‑well
Price per well
7.29
10.43
8.57
9.34
13.90
8.27
8.84
8.13
Price per 48‑well equivalent
3.50
4.99
4.11
4.48
6.67
3.98
4.22
3.88
Savings with Eco
30%
15%
22%
48%
12%
17%
10%
* This information reflects U.S. pricing.
The Eco comes with a one-year warranty that provides full coverage for all service parts and labor, hardware and software updates, and access to online training modules. The warranty includes comprehensive email and telephone support for the instrument, its applications, and its bioinformatics. Service is conducted at the manufacturer site and will be completed within five business days on average.
Extended warranty and calibration plans are available if needed.
Temperature Operating Range 15° to 30° C (59°F to 86° F)
Storage 10° to 38°C (50°F to 100°F)
Humidity Operating Range 15–90% RH
Storage 5–95%RH
The Eco optical system components do not move during operation, with the exception of the filter slide, which moves while measuring the four emission wavelengths for each sample at each cycle.
The optical system is calibrated prior to shipment and does not require recalibration. An optional yearly calibration plan is available. If your application requires annual validation, contact Customer Service at 1.800.809.4566 in the U.S. or email orders@illumina.com for pricing and assistance.
Illumina can offer Eco for only $13,900 through a combination of smart, simple design and engineering. Eco was designed using high-quality off-the-shelf components that require little to no customization, significantly reducing the cost of goods for each instrument. In addition, Eco is not sold through a traditional field sales and support team. All sales and support are managed directly through the Eco website which is more convenient for our customers.
The low cost of manufacturing, selling, and supporting Eco systems allows Illumina to pass the savings on to our customers and deliver the first affordable high-performance Real-Time PCR system.
The controls that are required depend on the type of Real-Time PCR experiment:
The 48-well plates used in the system are custom designed for the Eco, so you cannot substitute other plates or 8-tube (0.2 ml) strips. The plates are in a six-by-eight-well format with the same pitch and well size as standard 384-well Real-Time PCR plates. This means that you can use multichannel pipettes compatible with 384-well plates with the Eco plates.
Eco plates and seals are only available through Illumina.
The Eco evaluation plate contains PCR primers that are designed to detect and quantify an artificial DNA sequence, with template DNA at defined quantities or no template at all. A standard curve with 20000, 10000, 5000, 2500, and 1250 copies in quadruplicate is used to quantify an unknown population of 24 replicates.
A user simply needs to add 20 µl of master mix to each well at a 1X concentration, incubate to fully resuspend the lyophilized primers and template, then centrifuge the plate and load it into the Eco. The Eco software comes with a preloaded template run file that includes the plate layout as well as the thermal cycling conditions.
Upon analysis, the data will show PCR efficiency, R2, standard deviation of replicates, and the melt curve analysis. The plate is intended for demonstration purposes, software training, and validation.
On the Analysis page, click the Results tab. The well table on the right side of the window contains the quantification results. Quantity denotes the calculated quantity of each individual sample, and Average Quantity denotes the average quantity of all the replicates.
You might need to resize or scroll the table to see all rows and columns. To resize the width, drag the vertical grey bar separating the table from the graph.
There are two methods for setting up non-serial dilutions or dilutions with a factor greater than 10. The following list shows a set of non-serial dilutions:
Automated method: Click the Standards button beside your standard assay to open the Set Up Standards pane, and then click Define Standards to open the Dilutions dialog box. Enter “4” for the number of points, 4450000 as the starting quantity, and 10 as the dilution factor. Back in the main Set Up Standards pane, directly type the correct values for the last two dilutions into the appropriate fields.
Manual method: Click the Standards button beside your standard assay to open the Set Up Standards pane. Type 4450000 directly into the first field, and then press Enter to make the next field active. Type the second quantity into that field and continue until you have entered all four quantities.
The following list shows a set of serial dilutions:
To enter serial dilutions with a dilution factor between 2 and 10, click the Standards button beside your standard assay to open the Set Up Standards pane. Click Define Standards to set up the serial dilutions.
Hard copies of the setup poster and user guide are included with each Eco, and a soft copy is available on the USB drive. You can also download PDFs of the Eco documentation from http://www.illumina.com/ecoqpcr.
Illumina will handle all service and repair requests. If you have a service or repair request, please contact Technical Support.
Check http://www.illumina.com/ecoqpcr regularly to find out about new Eco developments and applications. In addition, read the Illumina monthly customer newsletter, Illuminotes, to be promptly notified of any changes to systems, applications, or documentation.
The Eco’s maximum power draw is 500 VA, which determines the VA rating of the UPS: > 500 VA.
The average power draw during aggressive Eco cycling is less than 300 VA, which determines the UPS capacity requirement.
The fastest way to answer most questions is to refer to the Eco Support web page or in these FAQs. If you do not find an answer there, you can reach Technical Support by email at techsupport@illumina.com, by phone at 1.800.809.4566 in the U.S., or on the Illumina website at http://www.illumina.com/support.
For the fastest, most efficient support, supply your name, institution, contact information, and the serial number from the grey label on the back of your instrument. The warranty, instrument, and previous case history are associated with the instrument serial number, so this information will enable Technical Support scientists to obtain the data they need to support you.
The simplest and most commonly used method is the dilution or standard curve method. This method calculates PCR efficiency using the linear regression slope of a dilution series based on either of the following equations:
The ideal slope is -3.32, which correlates to an amplification efficiency of 100%, meaning exactly one copy per cycle. Slopes in the range of -3.60 to -3.10 are generally considered acceptable for Real-Time PCR. These slope values correlate to amplification efficiencies between 90% (1.9) and 110% (2.1).
Amplification in NTC reactions can either be from contamination or non-specific amplification. Performing melt curve analysis can help identify if the signal is from contamination or from non-specific amplification.
If it is contamination, the melting curve of the NTC reaction will have the same Tm as your target sequence. Good aseptic technique, using aerosol-resistant pipette tips and a Real-Time PCR master mix with dUTP and UDG, can help to reduce any potential contamination.
If the signal is due to non-specific amplification, the melting curve of the NTC reaction will have a different Tm than the target sequence. The most common type of non-specific amplification is primer-dimer formation, and there are a number of ways to reduce this.
Optimal primer design is an important first step in preventing primer-dimer formation.
If these steps do not help reduce primer-dimer formation, redesigning the primers is necessary to obtain good results.